Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance


Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance > Posts > U.S. Court of Appeals Hears Argument on SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rules
U.S. Court of Appeals Hears Argument on SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rules

Yesterday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in a suit challenging the SEC’s conflict minerals rules, which were mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act and issued by the SEC on August 22, 2012.  The case came to the D.C. Circuit on appeal from a July 2013 district court decision upholding the SEC’s rules.  The rules had been challenged by the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable (the “Appellants”).

D.C. Circuit Judges David Sentelle, A. Raymond Randolph and Sri Srinivasan heard oral argument.  The Appellants argued that the SEC erroneously and arbitrarily refused to create a de minimis exception, misinterpreted the statute’s “did originate” requirement, extended the rules to non-manufacturers contrary to the statute, and designed an arbitrary and capricious phase-in period.  They also argued that the rules compel speech in violation of the First Amendment.  During oral argument, the topics that received the most attention from the parties and the Court were (1) the requirement to make disclosures if a company has reason to believe that its conflict minerals “may have originated” in the DRC region, rather than if its conflict minerals “did originate” in the DRC region, as the Dodd-Frank Act provides, and (2) whether certain aspects of the conflict minerals disclosure requirements—specifically, the requirement to designate a company’s products as “not found to be DRC Conflict Free” in reports filed with the SEC and posted on the company’s website—are compelled speech in violation of the First Amendment.  

The first reports under the conflict minerals rules are required to be filed on or before June 2, 2014, and the Court’s decision is expected before then.

For additional information about the conflict minerals rules, please see our client alert discussing the rules, available at, and our client alert on the SEC’s Frequently Asked Questions about the conflict minerals rules, available at   

 ‭(Hidden)‬ Blog Tools

© Copyright 2019 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. All information provided on this site is for informational purposes only, does not constitute legal advice, is not confidential, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Statements and content posted to this site do not represent the opinion of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP ("Gibson Dunn"). Gibson Dunn makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors or omissions therein, nor for any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.